INEC's leadership

Why Professor Mahmood Yakubu, INEC Commissioners cannot be reappointed–Ibrahim Yusuf

Why will Professor Mahmood Yakubu, Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC Chairman,  be reappointed as his tenure expires November? Why will his coterie of Commissioners on the INEC board be also reappointed after November expiring tenure? These posers have been engaging in the Nigerian political landscape. In some important respects, analysts delved into the archive to exhume the damming verdict of  European Union Election Observation Mission to  support their arguments. In the EU EOM’s final report on the 2019 general elections, the reputable global election monitoring body describes INEC as: “Systemic failings and low level of voter participation.” In addition, Dr lbrahim Yusuf who wrote from Minna , Niger State, takes exemption to the reappointment. Yusuf  views Yakubu’s quest for reappointment as an insult on Nigeria’s democratic practice.  In this piece, Yusuf queries Nigerians and international stakeholders for trusting INEC that has “exhibited such technical and operational  incompetence.” Ibrahim Yusuf’s perspective is presented below, unedited

In a few weeks, the tenure of most of the National Commissioners that make up the INEC board including the Chairman  Professor Mahmood  Yakubu will come to an end.

The five Commissioners, beside Mahmood Yakubu are  Prince  Solomon Adedeji Soyebi , Professor   Anthonia Okoosi  Simbine, Amina Zakari, Mustapha Lecky and  Alhaji Settima Arfo.

 Most Nigerians will be glad to see them go because  they will be leaving INEC worse than they met it.

When Professor Mahmood  and his team of Commissioners came to office after the 2015 election, fewer people  who contested elections petitioned the results of Elections,  but today post election petitions  are increasing  again and public confidence at an all time low after the 2019 election and subsequent elections in Kogi and Bayelsa states. When they came in 2016, a voter was three times more likely to vote  after proper verification and cast a ballot than today, because  in 2015  the  Smart Card Reader was used for verification  of voters biometric with over 55% rate of success was recorded but today less than 19% of voters are verified using the  Smart Card Reader biometric authentication before being allowed to vote, rendering  all the cost and efforts incurred  to obtain  an electronic  register of voters under Prof. Jega  almost useless,  imagine spending billions on a project  and 5years later a manager you hired to improve  it renders it more than 35% less effective, will you re-hire  or fire such a Manager?

A reliable  voters register  is a core element in the delivery  of credible elections, yet after 5years Prof Yakubu  and colleagues  managed  to make the voters Register  that Prof Jega and others left  in their care less reliable.

Furthermore, the most important task of the Professor Mahmood  tenure was the delivery  of an acceptable  General elections,  to see how he fared with his colleagues,  let us reference some independent  observers.

EUROPEAN UNION

For instance, the  European Union Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) to Nigeria, in its final report on the 2019 general elections concluded that there is a need for serious electoral reforms due to the “systemic failings and low level of voter participation”.  In addition,  the Observer mission  pointed out that, “considerable weaknesses remained. Operational deficiencies led to the postponement of the elections, there were insufficient checks and transparency in the results process, as well as a general lack of public communication and information.

The elections became increasingly marred by violence and intimidation, with the role of the security agencies becoming more contentious as the process progressed”. The EU EOM reported that “this damaged the integrity of the electoral process and may deter future participation”. If we are to take such independent  assessment  seriously,  then certainly  no one will take a government  that re-appoints the Managers of such a fiasco seriously  both in the national and global context.

YIAGA

Again, let us examine  another independent  but reliable  assessment by YIAGA Africa. According  to the independent  Observer body that also scored INEC low,  it assessed that;

“the elections were marred by various irregularities including delayed, ad-hoc officials recruitment and training; lack of effective planning, poor INEC constituted leadership; the president’s delay in appointing national commissioners; INEC’s overestimated own capabilities and underrated challenges; discrepancy between registered voters as announced before the election and during collation;  deliberate flouting of party guidelines, constitutions, INEC guidelines on party primaries and Electoral Act by political parties”

Further, YIAGA   Africa   added that “On Election Results management, election results management remains the weakest link in Nigeria’s electoral process. This necessitated the introduction of the electronic transmission of results by INEC to reduce the incidence of results mutilation and falsification.Why? INEC has been piloting the system with the off-cycle elections to test its efficiency and reliability.

“For the presidential elections, YIAGA AFRICA WTV findings indicate that INEC Presiding Officers electronically transmitted the Presidential election results using the Smart Card Reader in 65% of polling units. Collation officers exercised excessive discretionary powers in cancelling results and declared winners where the total number of registered voters in cancelled polling units will affect the margin of lead between candidates in flagrant violation of Section 26 and 53 of the 2010 Electoral Act as amended.”

YIAGA REPORT

What is noteworthy  of the YIAGA Africa  report is its  convincing report of transmission  of voting results from the field electronically in 65% of cases. Whereas for reasons best known to them, Professor Mahmood  Yakubu and and his Board members repudiated ever  doing so.

Why should  Nigerians and international  stakeholders  trust  a board that has exhibited  such technical and operational  incompetence? Why should a board  overburdened  by public mistrust following   many  inconclusive elections and petitions on elections it conducted be reappointed? A government  that  values its credibility  and integrity  before Nigerians and the international  community will avoid such  monumental  blunder twice.

Share This

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *